Observing Similarities in Art and Everyday Creativity

Authors

  • Russell Suereth Salve Regina University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/jah.v12i05.2378

Keywords:

Art, Creativity, Everyday, Aesthetics, Disconnection

Abstract

This article addresses a disconnect in our daily lives with art and everyday creativity. In our everyday lives, we rarely reflect on art we have seen at a local art museum or a sculpture at a library entrance. In our hurried pace, these works are only objects that have no bearing on our daily lives. Accordingly, art becomes disconnected from our daily lives and feels distant to us. The research in this article aims to identify the similarities between art and everyday creativity. Through this identification, we may become more aware that our daily lives are creative and that art can be an element of our everyday lives. The methodology in this research is based on our inner everyday creativity and the outer creative art we see in museums. Concentrating on these inner and outer spaces enables an expanded awareness in our research and daily lives. The findings suggest that similarities exist between art and the creativity in our everyday world. An awareness of these similarities can help us realize that art and creativity are essential elements of our daily lives and shorten the distance between ourselves, art, and everyday creativity.

References

Berger, K. (1999). A theory of art. Oxford University Press.

Carman, T. (2020). Merleau-Ponty (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Heidegger, M. (2001). Poetry, language, thought. (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). Perennial Library.

Haworth, J. (1997). Beyond reason: Pre-reflexive thought and creativity in art. Leonardo,

(2), 137–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1576425

Hu, X. (2019). A Kantian reading of aesthetic freedom and complete human nature nourished through art in a classical Chinese artistic context. Asian Philosophy, 29(2), 128–143.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2019.1610526

Kant, I. (1987). Critique of judgment. (W. S. Pluhar, Trans.). Hackett Pub.

Low, D. B. (2000). Merleau-Ponty’s last vision: A proposal for the completion of the visible and the invisible. Northwestern University Press.

Martiniano, C. (2016). The scientization of creativity. The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 49(2), 161–190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44164809

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). Basic writings. Routledge.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception. (D. A. Landes, Trans). Routledge.

Piancatelli, C., Massi, M., & Vocino, A. (2021). #artoninstagram: Engaging with art in the era of the selfie. International Journal of Market Research, 63(2), 134–160.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320963526

Richards, R. (2007a). Introduction. In R. Richards (Ed.), Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives (pp. 3–22). American Psychological Association.

Richards, R. (2007b). Everyday creativity: Our hidden potential. In R. Richards (Ed.), Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives (pp. 25–54). American Psychological Association.

Ricœur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action, and interpretation. (J. B. Thompson, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

Saito, Y. (2013). Everyday aesthetics. Oxford University Press.

Sallis, J. (2011). Freeing the Line. In K. Semonovitch, & N. DeRoo (Eds.), Merleau-Ponty at the limits of art, religion, and perception (21-29). Bloomsbury Publishing.

Sayers, E. (2014). ‘Equality of intelligences’: Exploring the barriers to engagement in modern and contemporary art through a peer-to-peer workshop at Tate Modern. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 33(3), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12065

Wiskus, J. (2013). The rhythm of thought: Art, literature, and music after Merleau-Ponty. University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-12

Issue

Section

Article

Similar Articles

11-20 of 269

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.