Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Medical Students: Croatian Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i2.1338Keywords:
vocabulary learning strategies, self-initiated vocabulary learning, formal vocabulary learning, spontaneous vocabulary learning, vocabulary knowledgeAbstract
In order to be able to fully develop their academic and professional competencies, medical doctors (MDs) need to be highly proficient in English, which, among other things, implies the acquisition of vocabulary as an essential part of language knowledge. The current study aims at exploring vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) employed by freshman and sophomore medical students at the University of Split School of Medicine, Croatia. In particular, it focuses on (a) most and least frequently used VLS; (b) relationship between VLS subscales and different types of vocabulary knowledge; (c) differences in the mean strategy use between male and female students, and among low-, middle- and high-scoring students. The instruments used in the research were adapted version of the VLS Questionnaire (Pavi?i? Taka?, 2008, p.152) and a vocabulary test designed by the author. The results indicate that medical students use a core inventory of VLS, whereby showing preference for the category of self-initiated vocabulary learning (SI-IVL) strategies and some individual formal vocabulary learning (FVL) and spontaneous vocabulary learning (SVL) strategies. Although students were not in favour of FVL at the level of the category as a whole, the results showed that the more frequently they employed FVL strategies, the better they scored on vocabulary tasks measuring controlled-productive type of vocabulary knowledge. Correlations revealed that female students used SI-IVL and FVL strategies significantly more often than their male counterparts. Results also suggest that there are no statistically significant differences in the mean VLS use among low-, middle- and high-scoring students. In conclusion, the results of this study provide a preliminary insight into the VLS used by medical students and their effect on students' vocabulary learning outcomes as well as into differences by gender and vocabulary proficiency. Since findings have proved rather inconclusive, these research questions need to be further investigated.
References
REFERENCES
Chen, Q. & Ge, G. C. (2007). A corpus-based lexical study on frequency and distribution of Coxhead’s AWL Word families in medical research articles (RAs). English for Specific Purposes, 26, 502–514.
Chin, C. (1999). The effects of three learning strategies on EFL vocabulary acquisition. The Korea TESOL Journal, 2, 1-12.
Cohen, A. D. (2003). The learner’s side of foreign language learning: Where do style, strategies, and tasks meet? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 279–291.
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. London, New York: Longman.
Cohen, A., & Weaver, S. (1998). Strategies-based instruction for second language learners. SEAMEO Journal, 45-67.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213-238.
Dörnyei, Z. & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. In C. J. Doughty i M. H. Long (Ur.) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (589-630). Oxford: Blackwell.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Doughty, C. & Long, M. (Eds.) (2008). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31, 313–330.
Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.
Green, J. M. i Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261–297.
Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, Academic Major, and Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Chinese Efl Learners. RELC Journal,33(1), 35-54.
Gu, P. Y. and Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.
Kojic-Sabo, I. & Lightbown, P.M. (1999). Students’ approaches to vocabulary learning and their relationship to success. The Modern Language Journal 83(2), 176-192.
Kudo, Y.(1999). L2 vocabulary learning strategies (2017, October 25). Honolulu: University of Hawai`i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved from: http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW14/
Kulikova, O. (2015). Vocabulary learning strategies and beliefs about vocabulary learning: a study of beginning university students of Russian in the United States. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa, USA.
Lawson, M. J. and Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary learning strategies of foreign language students. Language Learning, 46(1), 101-135.
Lawson, M. J., & Hogben, D. (1998). Learning and recall of foreign language vocabulary: Effects of a keyword strategy for immediate and delayed recall. Learning and Instruction, 8, 179-194.
Medved Krajnović, M. (2010). Od jednojezičnosti do višejezičnosti: Uvod u istraživanja procesa ovladavanja inim jezikom. Zagreb: Leykam International.
Mokhtar, A. A., Rawian, R. M., Yahaya, M. F., Abdullah, A., & Mohamed, A. R. (2017). Vocabulary learning strategies of adult ESL learners. The English Teacher, 12.
Mudraya, O. (2006). Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model. English for Specific Purposes, 25(2): 235-256.
Naiman, N., Frölich, M., Stern, H. & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Research in Education Series No. 7. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O'Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Pavičić, V. (1999). Model strateškog pristupa učenju vokabulara engleskog jezika. Strani jezici XXVIII (3-4), 209-217.
Pavičić, V. (2000). Istraživanje strategija učenja vokabulara. Strani jezici XXIX (1-2), 15- 26.
Pavičić Takač, V. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Peacock, M. & Ho, B. (2003). Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 179-200.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Read, J. (2004). Research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 146-161.
Richards, J., C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rodriguez, M., & Sadoski, M. (2000). Effects of rote, context, keyword, and context/keyword methods on retention of vocabulary in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 385-412.
Rogulj, J. (2005). Targeting Croatian Medical Professionals to Enhance English Language Profi ciency and Updating English for Medical Purposes Curriculum in Line with Ongoing Developments. Unpublished master's degree thesis, University of Surrey, UK.
Rogulj, J. (2016). Odnos između ličnosti, strategija učenja, strategija poučavanja i znanja engleskoga jezika. (Relationship between personality, learning strategies, teaching strategies and English language proficiency.) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Croatia.
Rogulj, J. and Čizmić, I. (2016). Vocabulary Learning Strategies at the Tertiary Level. In B. Plazibat & S. Kosanović (Eds.) Contemporary Issues in Economy and Technology, (CIET 2016), Conference proceedings. (222-231). Split: Sveučilište u Splitu.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the "Good Language Learner" Can Teach Us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy, 199-227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.
Stern, H.H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304–318.
Wang, J., Liang, S. L., & Ge, G.C. (2008). Establishment of a medical academic word list. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 442-458.
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. London: Prentice Hall.
Weber, P. (2005). Interactive Features in Medical Conference Monologue. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 157-181.
Zhang, B. (2009). FL Vocabulary Learning of Undergraduate English Majors in Western China: Perspective, Strategy Use and Vocabulary Size. Language Learning & Technology 2(3), 178-185.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
