Zika Virus and Transgenic Mosquitoes: Potentials of a Public Health Tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v6i01.1082Keywords:
African Philosophy, Bioethics, Dengue Fever, Ecocentrism, Environmental Ethics, Genetically Modified Mosquitoes, Holism, Malaria, WHO, Zika Virus.Abstract
With transgenic mosquitoes now being deployed as a major solution to the pandemic Zika virus disease, more curious questions have arisen about this public health technology. This essay reviews the philosophical considerations that presaged the development, by WHO, of the genetically modified mosquitoes. It focuses more specifically on the inter-disciplinary approach in formulating the clinical trials process. While it is still early to determine the full merits of this health intervention tool, it is nonetheless timely to examine the rich vein of form that constitutes the clinical trial protocol. I argue that the steps it suggests should be a gold standard for all clinical trial procedures including those that use human subjects and those with both direct and indirect environmental implications. Also, the early signs portend that its application could indeed be widespread. For instance, malaria and dengue fever were the original targets, but now the development of transgenic mosquito technology is deemed a potent option in the fight against Zika virus disease. In addition, this clinical trial protocol has remarkably gone beyond the four pillars of principlism to recognize the possibility that a new technology (such as GMM), can have the potential to simultaneously impact human individuals, the community and the ecosystem in tandem. In “Guidance framework for testing of genetically modified mosquito,” the WHO has set an example that calls for emulation. With the right awareness, biomedical researchers, scholars, policy makers, and students stand to benefit immensely from this reformulated approach.
References
American Public Health Association. Zika virus. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from https://www.apha.org/topics-and-issues/communicable-disease/zika?gclid=Cj0KEQiAsrnCBRCTs7nq wrm6pcYBEiQAcQSznDwN5r2qstosB7cLVJS_XuP25D6QYELndIba2URJ_zoaAiAr8P8HAQ
Andre, J. (2002). Bioethics as practice, Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
Asante, M. K. (2000). The Egyptian philosophers: Ancient African voices from Imhotep to Akhenaten, Chicago, IL: African American Images.
Barry, M. & Molyneux, M. (1992). Ethical dilemmas in malaria drug and vaccine trials: a bioethical perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics, (18), 189-192. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.4.189.
Benatar, S. 2004. Rationally defensible standards for research in developing countries. Health and Human Rights, 8(1), 197-202. doi: 10.2307/4065382.
Centers for Disease Control. Zika location. Retrieved December 12, 2016 from https://www.cdc.gov/zika
Elliot, K. (2011). Is a little pollution good for you? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Imran, S.; Alam, K.; & Beaumont, N. (2014). Reinterpreting the definition of sustainable development for a more ecocentric reorientation. Sustainable Development. (22), 134–144. doi:10.1002/sd.537.
Ingwe, R., Ebegbulem, J. & Ikeji, C. (2010). Ecocentric and anthropocentric policies and crises in climate/environment, finance and economy: Implications of the emerging green policy of the Obama administration for Africa’s sustainable development. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations. 4(1), 001-012.
Irving, D. (2000). What is ‘bioethics’ (Quid est ‘bioethics'?) Paper presented at the tenth annual conference: Life and learning X. Washington, DC.
Iyioke, I. V. (2016). Re-conceptualizing responsibility in clinical trials: An insight with the African notion of self. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Kelbessa, W. (2005). The utility of ethical dialogue for marginalized voices in Africa. In Proceedings of Sharpening policy tools for marginalized managers of natural resources. Department of Philosophy, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 150012, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kelbessa, W. (2011). Indigenous environmental philosophy. The Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kelbessa, W. (2011). Indigenous and Modern environmental ethics: A study of the indigenous Oromo environmental ethic and modern issues of environment and development, Washington DC: Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change, Series II, Africa, Vol. 13.
Kiadó, A. (2011). Theory of complex environmental responsibility. Társadalomkutatás, 29(3), 303-314. doi:10.1556/Tarskut.29.2011.3.2.
Khoury, M. J. (1997). Genetic epidemiology and the future of disease prevention and public health. Epidemiology Reviews, 19(1), 176.
Kukla, R. (2014). Living with pirates: Common morality and embodied practice. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 23(1), 75-85. doi:10.1017/S0963180113000480
Leopold, W. (1949). A Sand County Almanac, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Light, A. & Rolston, H. (eds.), (2002). Environmental Ethics: An Anthology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Marietta, D. (1995). For People and the Planet: Holism and Humanism in Environmental ethics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Martensen, R. (2001). The history of bioethics: An essay review. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 56(2), 168-175.
Macklin, R. (2004). Double Standards in Medical Research in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nelson, M. (2010). Teaching holism in environmental ethics (Unpublished pedagogical paper). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Olin, J., Kokolamami, J., Lepira, F., Mwandagalirwa, K., Mupenda, B., Lubaki, M., Mokili, J. (2006). Community preparedness for HIV vaccine trials in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 8, (6): 529-544. doi.org/10.1080/13691050600888434.
Pierce, J. & Jameton, A. (2004). The ethics of environmentally responsible health care, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Potter, V. R. (1988). Global bioethics: Building on the Leopold legacy. East Lansing Michigan: Michigan State University Press.
Potter, V. R. (1990). Getting to the Year 3000: Can global bioethics overcome evolution’s fatal flaw?” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 8(2), 185-186. doi:10.1080/10590509009373376.
Potter, V. R. & Potter, L. (1995). Global bioethics: Converting sustainable development to global survival. Medicine and Global Survival, 2(3), 9-17.
Porter, V. R. & Whitehouse, P. J. (1998). Deep and global bioethics for a livable world. Scientist, 12(1), 9.
Porter, V. R. (199). Fragmented ethics and ‘Bridges Bioethics.’ Hastings Center Report 29(1), 38-40.
Quammen, D. (2016, January 28). Why Zika is this year’s scary virus. National Geographic. Retrieved December 12, 2016 from http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/01/160128-zika-virus-birth-defects-brian-damage-history-science/
Quigley, D. (2006). A review of improved ethical practices in environmental and public health research: Case examples from Native communities. Health Educational Behavior, (33), 130. doi:10.1177/1090198104272053.
Rendtorff, J. D. (2002). Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw: Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability – Towards a foundation of bioethics and biolaw. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, (5), 235-244. doi:10.1023/A:1021132602330.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (online), Environmental ethics. Retrieve June 20, 2014, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-environmental/
Tangwa, G. B. (2004). Some African Reflections on Biomedical and Environmental Ethics. In K. Wiredu (Ed.). A Companion to African philosophy (pp. 387-395). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Bioethics. Retrieved June 26, 2014, from http://www.iep.utm.edu/bioethic/#SH2a.
Verharen, C. C. (2006). Philosophy against empire: An ancient Egyptian renaissance. Journal of Black Studies, 36(6): 958-973.
Whitehouse, P. J. (1999). The Ecomedical disconnection syndrome. The Hastings Center Report, 29, 1: 41-44. doi:10.2307/3528539.
World Health Organization. Dengue/dengue haemorrhagic fever. Retrieved May 28, 2014, from http://www.who.int/csr/disease/dengue/en/
World Health Organization. Factsheet on the World Malaria Report 2013. Retrieved May 28, 2014,from
http://www.who.int/malaria/media/world_malaria_report_2013/en/
World Health Organization. (2014). Guidance framework for testing of genetically modified mosquitoes. A health information product by the WHO-executed UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/World Health Organizations Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization: International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2013, October, 17). Press Release, No. 221. Retrieved December 17, 2014, from https://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/iarcnews /pdf/pr221_E.pdf
World Health Organization. Factsheet on the World Malaria Report 2013. Retrieved May 28, 2014, from http://www.who.int/malaria/media/world_malaria_report_2013/en/
World Health Organization. Zika virus. Retrieved December 12, 2016 from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/zika/en/
Ziman, J. (1998). Why must scientists become more ethically sensitive than they used to be?” Science, 282(5395): 1813-814. doi:10.1126/science.282.5395.1813.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
