Vladimir Lenin on Oblomov

Authors

  • javed akhtar universBalochistan Quetta
  • javed akhtar University of Balochistan Quetta Pakistan
  • javed akhtar M. Phil Scholar University of Balochistan Quetta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v4i11.829

Keywords:

Oblomov, Oblomovism, Inertia, Procrastination, Indecision, Revolution 1. Introduction

Abstract

This research paper tends to highlight Vladimir Lenin’s views and attitude towards work and indolence. Therefore, he admires work, action and revolution, which are characteristics of the proletarians, and condemns lethargy, inertia, indolence, indecision and procrastination, which are peculiar to the surf-owning and land-owning feudal nobility.  Vladimir Lenin condemns Ivan Goncharov’s most famous character Oblomov frequently in his speeches and writings, which represents the surf-owning and land-owning feudal nobility of the nineteenth-century Tsarist Russian social formation. In fact, Oblomov like other literary types have definite historical roots, which are closely related to the way of life of a particular class. In this manner, his class nature or Oblomovism typifies the sloth of the serf-owning and land-owning nobility. These traits of Oblomov have not become out-dated but the class they typify has become something of the past. Vladimir Lenin pays full attention to the lasting and broad-scale implications of Oblomov’s character, which crosses the limits of his social milieu and age, picking up the penetrating insight into the class nature of Oblomov’s character. Vladimir Lenin highlights the continuing relevance of Oblomov’s character in his own times, criticising Oblomov and Oblomovism and identifies his political rivals and enemies around him with Oblomov. 

Author Biographies

  • javed akhtar, universBalochistan Quetta
    M. Phil. scholar university of Balochistan Quetta
  • javed akhtar, University of Balochistan Quetta Pakistan

    M.Phil scholar

    English department

  • javed akhtar, M. Phil Scholar University of Balochistan Quetta
    English Department

References

Berger, John. (1969). Art and Revolution. New York: Pantheon Books.

V. D. Bonch-Bruyevch. (1955). “Lenin on Books and Writers” in Literaturnaya Gazeta, April 24, 1955.

Deutscher, Isaac. (1970). Lenin’s Childhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Deutscher, Tamara. (1973) Not by Politics Alone. London.

Dobrolyubov, Nikolai Aleksandrovich. (1956). “What is Oblomovism?” In: Selected Philosophical Essays. Moscow. Pp. 182-194, 204-217.

Dutton, Michael and Paul Healy. (2001). “Marxist Theory and Socialist Transition: The Construction of an Epistemological Relation” In: Chinese Marxism in Flux. (ed.), Bill Brugger. London and Sidney: Croom Helm.

Eagleton. Terry. (1992). Marxism and Literary Criticism. London: Routledge.

Eagleton. Terry. (1992). Criticism and Ideology. London and New York: Verso.

Fischer, Ernst. (1960). Art and Ideology. New York: The Penguin Press.

Goncharov, Ivan. (1915). Oblomov. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Klingender, F. D. (1975). Marxism and Modern Art: An Approach to Social Realism, in the Marxism Today Series. (ed.), Professor Benjamin Farrington. London: Lawrence & Wishart Ltd.

Krupskaya, Nadezhda, K. (1930). Memories of Lenin. Allahabad, India: India Publishers. Appendix. Pp. 134-152.

Lenin, V I. (1933). Religion. Collection first published as part of the Little Lenin. New York: Library International Publishers.

Lenin, V. I. (1965). Collected Works, Vol. 10. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Pp. 44-49.

Lenin, V. I. (1970). Collected Works, Vol. 33. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Lenin, V. I. (1970). Collected Works, Vol. 34. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

V.I, Lenin. (1978) On Literature and Art. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Lifshitz, Mikhail. (1938). Literature and Marxism: A Controversy. New York: Critics Group. Series, No. 9.

Lunacharsky, A, V. (1932). “For the Centenary of Alexandrinsky Theatre” In: Konstantin Derzhavin, Epochs of the Alexandrinsky Theatre. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Pp. 1X-X1.

Lunacharsky, A, V. (1933). “Lenin and the Arts”. In: Recollections of Lenin. Partizdat. Pp. 46-51.

Macherey, Pierre. (1978). A Theory of Literary Production. London: Henley and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Macherey, P. Balibar, E. (1978). “On Literature as an Ideological Form: Some Marxist Propositions”. Trans. I. McLeod, J. Whitehead and A. Wordsworth. In: Untying the Text, ed. R. Young. (London: RKP, 1981) first published in Oxford Literary Review, Vol. 3, No.1, 1978, Pp. 4-12.

Marx, Karl and F. Engels. (1975). Collected Works, Vol. 25. New York: International Publishers.

Prilezhayeva, Maria. (1978). V.I. Lenin: The Story of His Life. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Read, Christopher. (2005) Lenin: A Revolutionary Life. London and New York: Routledge.

Service, Robert. (2000). Lenin: A Biography. London: Pan Books.

Shcherbina, Vladimir. (1974). Lenin and Problems of Literature. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Smirnov, A.A. (1936). Shakespeare: A Marxist Interpretation, New York: Critics Group.

Valentinov, N. (1968). Encounter with Lenin. London.

Valentinov, N. (1969). The Early Years of Lenin. Michigan.

Zetkin, Clara. (1956) My Recollections of Lenin. Moscow.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-03

Issue

Section

Article

Similar Articles

1-10 of 127

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.