Model for Empowering Farmers at Dry Land through Quadruple Helix Approach

Authors

  • Etty Soesilowati Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v6i4.1131

Keywords:

Dry land, Farmers Empowerment, Quadruple Helix.

Abstract

There are many potentials in the sector of silvoagriculture, silvopastura and silvoagrofishery at Kandri and Cepoko district as “green belt” areas of Semarang. Unfortunately, these potentials do not give a significant impact on society yet. This is due to the lack of farmer’s institution system, limited human resource, and infrastructure. The Triple Helix approach involving academician, businessman, and government is found to be less optimal. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of the model used for empowering the farmers at dry land area through the Quadruple Helix approach as the development of Triple Helix one involving academician, businessman, civil society, and government. The locus of the research area is Kandri and Cepoko district at Gunungpati subdistrict in Semarang City of Central Java Province, Indonesia. This research employed qualitative and quantitative approaches. In the qualitative approach, the data are analyzed using an interactive model. While the quantitative approach, Human Development Index (HDI) analysis is employed. The results find that farmers' empowerment program is conducted through the Quadruple Helix approach by involving academicians, businessmen, local governments and civil society groups at the villages. Then, the HDI calculation results show that the index of human development in Kandri has decreased 0.09444. Before the program, it was amounted from 0.82367 to 0.72923. Whereas, the human development index of farmers in Cepoko before the program has increased from 0.83142 to 0.84085. Its increase reaches 0.09425. This indicates that the farmer group at Cepoko district is more resistant to national economic issues such as the weak exchange rate than the farmers in Kandri disctrict. Therefore, this study makes recommendation that farmers should organize integrated farming by establishing integrated economic region so that they can make use of existing resources efficiently and effectively.   

References

Alphonsus O. Isidiho and Moh Shatar B. Sabran. (2016). Evaluating the Top-Bottom and Bottom-Up Community Development Approaches: Mixed Method Approach as Alternative for Rural Un-Educated Communities in Developing Countries. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy . Vol 7 No 4 July

Asmoro, Eddi I. 2012. Perancangan Inkubator Model Triple Helix Untuk Efektivitas Proses Knowledge Transfer Sebagai Strategi Pengembangan IKM. Makalah. Proceeding Call for Paper Pekan Ilmiah Dosen FEB 14 Desember. UKSW

Bappeda. (2014). Kota Semarang Dalam Angka. Kota Semarang : Badan Pusat Statistik

Bercovitz,J dan Feldman, M. “Entrepreunerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development, The Journal of Technology Transfer (31:1) 2006,pp 175-188.

Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen. (1998). Qualitative Recearch for Education : An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Allyn and Bacon. Boston. London

Brian D. Christens. (2012). Targeting empowerment in community development: a community psychology approach to enhancing local power and well-being. Community Development Journal. Vol 47 No 4 October 2012 pp. 538–554

Dinas PSDA Jawa Tengah. (2008). Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Air Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2012-2032. Diakses dari psda.jatengprov.go.id/ppid/dokumen/Pergub-No-48.

Dwi H. Mulyaningsih. (2014). Enhancing Innovation in Quadruple Helix Perspektive : The Case of The Business Incubators in Indonesia. International Conference on Global Trends in Academic Research, June 2-3. GTAR© 2014 Bali, Indonesia Global Illuminators, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Listya C. Darmawan. (2016). Analysis of urban agriculture sustainability in Metropolitan Jakarta (case study: urban agriculture in Duri Kosambi) . Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 227 (95 – 100)

Loet,L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, and an N-Tuple of Helices : Explanatory Modelsfor Analyzing The Knowledge- Based Economy. Journal Knowledge Economic, 3(2), 25-35

Mulyana. 2014. Peran Quadruple Helix Dalam Meningkatkan Kapabilitas Inovasi dan Keunggulan Bersaing. Makalah. 3rd Economics and Business Research Festival, 13 Nopember. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UKSW

Oscar. A., S. Monterino, & M. Thomshon. (2010). A Grrowth Model for Quadruple Helix Innovation Theory. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 13(4), 1-31

Restutiningsih. NL, I Ketut Surya Diarta, I Wayan Sudarta. (2016). Motivasi Petani dalam Berusahatani Hortikultura di Desa Wisata Candikuning, Kecamatan Baturiti, Kabupaten Tabanan. E-Jurnal Agribisnis dan Agrowisata ISSN: 2301-6523 Vol.5, No.1, Januari 2016

Saidi, Zaim dan Hamid Abidin (2004), Menjadi Bangsa Pemurah : Wacana dan Praktek Kedermawanan Sosial di Indonesia, Jakarta : Piramedia

Soesilowati dkk. (2016). Strategic Policies for Increasing the Competitive Powers of Indonesian Horticultural Products in ASEAN Markets. Pertanika Journal. Social Science & Humanities. 24 (S): 95 - 110 (2016)

..................... (2016). IbW Unnes- Pemerintah Kota Semarang. Laporan Kegiatan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat DRPM Ristek Dikti.

................, Dyah Rini Indriyanti, dan Widiyanto. (2011). Model Corporate Social Responsibility dalam Program Pemberdayaan Petani Hortikultura. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Volume 12, Nomor 1, Juni 2011, hlm.102-117

Suryana. (2000). Ekonomi Pembangunan: Problematika dan Pendekatan. Edisi Pertama, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Xiaobo.W. & V. Sivalogathasan. (2013). Intellectual Capital for Innovation Capability : A Conceptual Model for Innovation. International Journal of Trade and Finance, 4 (3). 139 - 144

Downloads

Published

2017-03-26

Issue

Section

Article

Similar Articles

21-30 of 74

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.